Везде

RAS PhysiologyФизиология человека Human Physiology

  • ISSN (Print) 0131-1646
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6150

Acoustic and Semantic Auditory Processing of Continuous Speech: a Time Response Function Analysis for MEG Data

You can
PII
S30346150S0131164625040053-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034615025040053
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. S. Ovakimian
  • Affiliation:
    Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the RAS
    Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
Volume/ Edition
Volume 51 / Issue number 4
Pages
69-80
Abstract
Speech perception is a complex process involving multilevel neurophysiological processing of various speech components. In the presented work, we used temporal response function (TRF), a novel method of processing the magnetoencephalogram (MEG) recorded while listening to continuous speech to analyse the neural response to auditory and semantic components of speech during its perception in vivo. The temporal response to dynamic changes in the sound envelope demonstrated an early neurophysiological response: from 20 ms with an amplitude peak at 100 ms, and the response to the perception of word onset had a peak latency at 120 ms. The semantic component of speech showed a later temporal response: from 200 ms with a peak latency of 300 ms bilaterally in temporal magnetometers. Thus, TRF showed a later response to semantic changes in speech than to changes in acoustic features in the MEG study.
Keywords
восприятие речи МЭГ функция временного отклика
Date of publication
01.08.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
48

References

  1. 1. Forseth K.J., Hickok G., Rollo P.S., Tandon N. Language prediction mechanisms in human auditory cortex // Nat. Commun. 2020. V. 11. № 1. P. 5240.
  2. 2. Foti D., Roberts F. The neural dynamics of speech perception: Dissociable networks for processing linguistic content and monitoring speaker turn-taking // Brain Lang. 2016. V. 157. P. 63.
  3. 3. Evans S., Davis M.H. Hierarchical organization of auditory and motor representations in speech perception: Evidence from searchlight similarity analysis // Cereb. Cortex. 2015. V. 25. № 12. P. 4772.
  4. 4. Okada K., Rong F., Venezia J. et al. Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: Evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech // Cereb. Cortex. 2010. V. 20. № 10. P. 2486.
  5. 5. Петрушевский А. Г., Майорова Л. А. фМРТ-корреляты категоризации звуков речевой и неречевой природы в слуховой коре // Физиология человека. 2019. Т. 45. № 6. С. 5.
  6. 6. Henry M.J., Obleser J. Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012. V. 109. № 49. P. 20095.
  7. 7. Kleeva D.F., Rebreikina A.B., Soghoyan G.A. et al. Generalization of sustained neurophysiological effects of short‐term auditory 13‐Hz stimulation to neighbouring frequency representation in humans // Eur. J. Neurosci. 2022. V. 55. № 1. P. 175.
  8. 8. Tomé D., Barbosa F., Nowak K., Marques-Teixeira J. The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: A systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values // J. Neural Transm. 2015. V. 122. № 3. P. 375.
  9. 9. Voola M., Nguyen A.T., Marinovic W. et al. Oddeven oddball task: Evaluating event-related potentials during word discrimination compared to speech-token and tone discrimination // Front. Neurosci. 2022. V. 16. P. 983498.
  10. 10. Larionova E.V., Martynova O.V. Frequency effects on spelling error recognition: An ERP study // Front. Psychol. 2022. V. 13. P. 834852.
  11. 11. Liaukovich K., Ukraintseva Y., Martynova O. Implicit auditory perception of local and global irregularities in passive listening condition // Neuropsychologia. 2022. V. 165. P. 108129.
  12. 12. Ребрейкина А.Б., Ларионова Е.В., Мартынова О.В. Динамика вызванных потенциалов в процессе становления грамотности // Современная зарубежная психология. 2020. Т. 9. № 2. С. 21.
  13. 13. Ребрейкина А.Б., Клеева Д.Ф., Согоян Г.А., Сысоева О.В. Влияние слуховой LTP-подобной стимуляции на обработку звуковых стимулов // Сенсорные Системы. 2021. Т. 35. № 2. С. 144.
  14. 14. Kraus N., McGee T., Carrell T.D., Sharma A. Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination // Ear Hear. 1995. V. 16. № 1. P. 19.
  15. 15. Sysoeva O.V., Molholm S., Djukic A. et al. Atypical processing of tones and phonemes in Rett Syndrome as biomarkers of disease progression // Transl. Psychiatry. 2020. V. 10. № 1. P. 188.
  16. 16. Näätänen R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm) // Psychophysiology. 2001. V. 38. № 1. P. 1.
  17. 17. Chen T.C., Hsieh M.H., Lin Y.T. et al. Mismatch negativity to different deviant changes in autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2020. V. 131. № 3. P. 766.
  18. 18. Рогачев А.О., Сысоева О.В. Функция временного отклика — новый метод исследования нейрофизиологических механизмов восприятия речи в экологически валидных условиях // Современная зарубежная психология. 2024. Т. 13. № 1. С. 92.
  19. 19. Lalor E.C., Pearlmutter B.A., Reilly R.B. et al. The VESPA: A method for the rapid estimation of a visual evoked potential // Neuroimage. 2006. V. 32. № 4. P. 1549.
  20. 20. Lalor E.C., Power A.J., Reilly R.B., Foxe J.J. Resolving precise temporal processing properties of the auditory system using continuous stimuli // J. Neurophysiol. 2009. V. 102. № 1. P. 349.
  21. 21. Brodbeck C., Simon J. Z. Continuous speech proces-sing // Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2020. V. 18. P. 25.
  22. 22. Brodbeck C., Das P., Gillis M. et al. Eelbrain, a Python toolkit for time-continuous analysis with temporal response functions // Elife. 2023. V. 12. P. e85012.
  23. 23. Brodbeck C., Hong L.E., Simon J.Z. Rapid transformation from auditory to linguistic representations of continuous speech // Curr. Biol. 2018. V. 28. № 24. P. 3976.
  24. 24. Donhauser P.W., Baillet S. Two distinct neural timescales for predictive speech processing // Neuron. 2020. V. 105. № 2. P. 385.
  25. 25. Майорова Л.А., Мартынова О.В., Балабан П.М. и др. Негативность рассогласования и ее гемодинамический эквивалент (по данным фМРТ) в исследованиях восприятия речи в норме и при речевых расстройствах // Усп. физ. наук. 2014. Т. 45. № 1. С. 27.
  26. 26. Буторина А. В., Шестакова А.Н., Николаева А.Ю. и др. Функциональное картирование речевых зон мозга человека: перспективы использования метода магнитоэнцефалографии (МЭГ) // Современная зарубежная психология. 2012. Т. 1. № 1. С. 103.
  27. 27. Khalighinejad B., da Silva G.C., Mesgarani N. Dynamic encoding of acoustic features in neural responses to continuous speech // J. Neurosci. 2017. V. 37. № 8. P. 2176.
  28. 28. MacGregor L.J., Pulvermüller F., van Casteren M., Shtyrov Y. Ultra-rapid access to words in the brain // Nat. Commun. 2012. V. 3. № 1. P. 711.
  29. 29. Lowe M.X., Mohsenzadeh Y., Lahner B. et al. Cochlea to categories: The spatiotemporal dynamics of semantic auditory representations // Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2021. V. 38. № 7-8. P. 468.
  30. 30. Верхлютов В.М., Бурлаков Е.О., Гуртовой К.Г., Введенский В.Л. Распознавание устной речи по данным МЭГ с использованием ковариационных фильтров // Журн. высш. нерв. деят. им. И.П. Павлова. 2023. Т. 73. № 6. C. 800.
  31. 31. Van Petten C., Coulson S., Rubin S. et al. Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language // J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1999. V. 25. № 2. P. 394.
  32. 32. Orepic P., Truccolo W., Halgren E. et al. Neural mani-folds carry reactivation of phonetic representations during semantic processing // bioRxiv. [Electronic resourse]. 2024. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.30.564638
  33. 33. Broderick M.P., Anderson A.J., Lalor E C. Semantic context enhances the early auditory encoding of natural speech // J. Neurosci. 2019. V. 39. № 38. P. 7564.
  34. 34. Getz L.M., Toscano J.C. Electrophysiological evidence for top-down lexical influences on early speech perception // Psychol. Sci. 2019. V. 30. № 6. P. 830.
  35. 35. Вайтулевич С.Ф., Петропавловская Е.А., Шестопалова Л.Б., Никитин Н.И. Функциональная межполушарная асимметрия мозга человека и слуховая функция // Физиология человека. 2019. Т. 45. № 2. С. 103.
  36. 36. Дмитриева Е.С., Гельман В.Я., Зайцева К.А., Орлов А.М. Оценка связи восприятия эмоциональной интонации речи с компонентами эмоционального интеллекта // Психология. Журнал ВШЭ. 2012. T. 9. № 1. C. 126.
  37. 37. Лебедева Н.Н., Каримова Е.Д., Казимирова Е.А. Анализ речевого сигнала в исследованиях функционального состояния человека // Биомедицинская радиоэлектроника. 2015. № 2. С. 3.
  38. 38. Verwoert M., Amigó-Vega J., Gao Y. et al. Whole-brain dynamics of articulatory, acoustic and semantic speech representations // bioRxiv. [Electronic resourse]. 2024. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.15.608082
  39. 39. Menenti L., Petersson K.M., Hagoort P. From reference to sense: How the brain encodes meaning for speaking // Front. Psychol. 2012. V. 2. P. 384.
  40. 40. Luthra S. The role of the right hemisphere in processing phonetic variability between talkers // Neurobiol. Lang. 2021. V. 2. № 1. P. 138.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library