RAS PhysiologyФизиология человека Human Physiology

  • ISSN (Print) 0131-1646
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6150

Features of Perception of a Person's Own Name Compared to the Perception of Names with Similar and Different Soundings: Analysis of Event-Related Potentials

PII
S3034615025020012-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034615025020012
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 51 / Issue number 2
Pages
3-13
Abstract
In recent years, there has been an increased interest in understanding how humans distinguish their own names from other stimuli. This can be attributed to the intensive development of personalized approaches in medicine, psychology, and rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was, based on an analysis of the bioelectrical activity of the brain, to identify the characteristics of a person’s perception of his own name in comparison with stimuli of similar and different sounds. The study included 29 healthy participants aged 18 to 48 who had common Russian names and used short forms of those names. Event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded during a task involving the participants' own names, similar names, words with similar sounds, different names, and Chukchi words. Data analysis involved estimating the amplitude of the ERP response and conducting factor analysis. In the ERP, two time intervals were identified in which differences appeared in response to different types of stimuli. The first complex corresponds to the N100 and P200 peaks and the first syllable of the stimuli. The second complex corresponds to a negative peak at a latency of 400-600 ms from the beginning of the stimulus or the second syllable. Factor analysis carried out on these two identified intervals revealed the presence of three factors related to different groups of electrodes. The data obtained through factor analysis allows us to conclude that perception of one's own name takes place in several stages. The first stage corresponds to the isolation of the first syllable and the final stage to the evaluation of the entire word (name). It can be assumed that various functional systems are involved in perception of one's own name and contribute to maintaining wakefulness, attention, and perception of auditory and verbal information.
Keywords
восприятие собственного имени ПСС биоэлектрическая активность мозга факторный анализ
Date of publication
01.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
37

References

  1. 1. Dali S., Atasuntseva A., Shankar M. et al. Say my name: Understanding the power of names, correct pronunciation, and personal narratives // MedEdPORTAL. 2022. V. 18. P. 11284.
  2. 2. Davies-House A., Ball N., Balmer C. Meeting and greeting in the clinical setting - are we doing what patients want? // Br. Dent. J. 2017. V. 222. № 6. P. 457.
  3. 3. Fischler I., Jin Y.S., Boaz T.L. et al. Brain potentials related to seeing one's own name // Brain Lang. 1987. V. 30. № 2. P. 245.
  4. 4. Perrin F., Maquet P., Peigneux P. et al. Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: A combined ERPs and PET study // Neuropsychologia. 2005. V. 43. № 1. P. 12.
  5. 5. Holtze B., Jaeger M., Debener S. et al. Are they calling my name? Attention capture is reflected in the neural tracking of attended and ignored speech // Front. Neurosci. 2021. V. 15. P. 643705.
  6. 6. Tateuchi T., Itoh K., Nakada T. Neural mechanisms underlying the orienting response to subject's own name: An event-related potential study // Psychophysiol. 2012. V. 49. № 6. P. 786.
  7. 7. Ruby P.M., Blochet C., Eichenlaub J.-B. et al. Alpha reactivity to first names differs in subjects with high and low dream recall frequency // Front. Psychol. 2013. V. 4. P. 419.
  8. 8. Mandel D.R., Jusczyk P.W., Pisoni D.B. Infants’ recognition of the sound patterns of their own names // Psychol. Sci. 1995. V. 6. № 5. P. 314.
  9. 9. Портнова Г.В., Канцерова А.О., Окнина Л.Б. и др. Увеличение пиковой частоты альфа-ритма ЭЭГ при предъявлении собственного имени во время глубокой анестезии // Журн. высш. нервн. деят. им. И.П. Павлова. 2023. Т. 73. № 5. С. 622.
  10. 10. Carmody D.P., Lewis M. Brain activation when hearing one's own and others' names // Brain Res. 2006. V. 1116. № 1. P. 153.
  11. 11. Nijhof A.D., Dhar M., Goris J. et al. Atypical neural responding to hearing one’s own name in adults with ASD // J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2018. V. 127. № 1. P. 129.
  12. 12. Doradzińska L., Wójcik M.J., Paź M. et al. Unconscious perception of one's own name modulates amplitude of the P3B ERP component // Neuropsychologia. 2020. V. 147. P. 107564.
  13. 13. Tacikowski P., Cygan H., Nowicka A. Neural correlates of own and close-other’s name recognition: ERP evidence // Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014. V. 8. P. 194.
  14. 14. Nasreddine Z.S., Phillips N.A., Bédirian V. et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment // J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005. V. 53. № 4. P. 695.
  15. 15. Котик Б.С. Исследование латерализации речевой функции методом дихотического прослушивания / Психологические исследования // Под ред. Леонтьева А.Н., Хомской Е.Д., Артемьевой Е.Ю., Асмолова А.Г. М.: Издательство Московского университета, 1974. Вып. 6. С. 69.
  16. 16. Ляшевская О.Н., Шаров С.А. Частотный словарь современного русского языка (на материалах Национального корпуса русского языка). М.: Азбуковник, 2009. 1168 c.
  17. 17. Tadel F., Baillet S., Mosher J.C. et al. Brainstorm: A user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis // Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011. V. 2011. P. 879716.
  18. 18. Lloret S., Ferreres A., Hernández A., Tomás I. The exploratory factor analysis of items: Guided analysis based on empirical data and software // Anales de Psicología. 2017. V. 33. № 2. P. 417.
  19. 19. Demertzi A., Soddu A., Laureys S. Consciousness supporting networks // Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2013. V. 23. № 2. P. 239.
  20. 20. Volfart A., Jonas J., Maillard L. et al. Neurophysiological evidence for crossmodal (face-name) person-identity representation in the human left ventral temporal cortex. Neurophysiological evidence for crossmodal (face-name) person-identity representation in the human left ventral temporal cortex // PLoS Biol. 2020. V. 18. № 4. P. e3000659.
  21. 21. Höller Y., Kronbichler M., Bergmann J. et al. EEG frequency analysis of responses to the own-name stimulus // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011. V. 122. № 1. P. 99.
  22. 22. Winer J.A. Decoding the auditory corticofugal systems // Hear. Res. 2006. V. 212. № 1-2. P. 1.
  23. 23. Friederici A.D. The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function // Physiol. Rev. 2011. V. 91. № 4. P. 1357.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library