RAS PhysiologyФизиология человека Human Physiology

  • ISSN (Print) 0131-1646
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6150

Eye Movements and Autonomic Regulation of Cognitive Activity during Reading in Adolescence. Part II. Eye Movements during Reading and its Relation Between on the Reading Skill and Comprehension of the Text in Adolescence

PII
S3034615025020032-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034615025020032
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 51 / Issue number 2
Pages
29-42
Abstract
The parameters of oculomotor activity (OMA) were studied in 22 adolescents aged 15 (M = 15.46, SD = 0.44) when reading a complex text. Based on a set of objective OMA parametres, groups with different levels of reading skills were identified (Group 1 - high, Group 2 - low). Analysis of the spatial and temporal parameters of OMA revealed deficits in the development of reading process mechanisms in 40.9% of adolescents. A comparative analysis of the OMA parameters in adolescents showed significant differences depending (relation between) on the level of reading skill development. The advantages of Group 1 children were manifested in a smaller percentage of regressive saccades and corrective saccades when moving to a new line, as well as a larger amplitude of progressive saccades. This eye movement trajectory was reflected in the amount of text read and the speed, which were significantly higher in Group 1 adolescents (p < 0.001) compared to Group 2 adolescents. This indicates a more developed reading skill and, apparently, a more effective reading strategy. A qualitative analysis of the reading process allowed for the identification of the OMA features depending on the development level of the reading skill. A well-developed (high) reading skill was characterized by the omissions of certain function words and repetitive words. A less automated (low) skill was accompanied by difficulties in understanding syntactic constructions when rereading endings, prepositions and parts of a sentence, including isolated ones. The analysis of comprehension of the text and memorizing specific data did not reveal a significant difference between the analyzed groups of adolescents. At the same time, a higher variability of comprehension was revealed in adolescents of group 2. High and low levels of text comprehension were noted both in those with a well-developed of reading skill and in those with an insufficiently automated skill. This allowed for analysis of individual reading strategies in relation to different level of text comprehension and for a discussion of the possible influence of the development of cognitive components of reading on comprehension.
Keywords
чтение подростки навык чтения понимание окуломоторная активность
Date of publication
01.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
32

References

  1. 1. Krstic K., Soskic A., Kovic V., Holmqvist K. All Good Readers are the same, but every low-skilled reader is different: an eye-tracking study using PISA data // Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2018. V. 33. P. 521.
  2. 2. Oslund E.L., Clemens N.H., Simmons D.C., Simmons L.E. The direct and indirect effects of word reading and vocabulary on adolescents’ reading comprehension: Comparing struggling and adequate comprehenders // Read Writ. 2018. V. 31. P. 355.
  3. 3. Nippold M.A. Reading comprehension deficits in adolescents: Addressing underlying language abilities // Lang. Speech. Hear. Serv. Sch. 2017. V. 48. № 2. P. 125.
  4. 4. Ricketts J., Lervåg A., Dawson N. et al. Reading and oral vocabulary development in early adolescence // Sci. Stud. Read. 2019. V. 24. P. 1.
  5. 5. Kim Y.-S.G., Quinn J.M., Petscher Y. What is text reading fluency and is it a predictor or an outcome of reading comprehension? A longitudinal investigation // Dev. Psychol. 2021. V. 57. № 5. P. 718.
  6. 6. Ahmed Y., Francis D.J., York M. et al. Validation of the direct andinferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12 // Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2016. V. 44-45. P. 68.
  7. 7. Strukelj A., Niehorster D. One page of text: Eye movements during regular and thorough reading, skimming, and spell checking // J. Eye Mov. Res. 2018. V. 11. № 1. doi: 10.16910/jemr.11.1.1
  8. 8. Безруких М.М. Трудности обучения в начальной школе. Причины, диагностика, комплексная помощь. М.: Диалог-Медиа, 2023. 500 с.
  9. 9. Oakhill J., Cain K. The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study // Sci. Stud. Read. 2012. V. 16. P. 91.
  10. 10. Kraal A., Koornneef A., Saab N., van den Broek P. Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children // Read Writ. 2018. V. 31. № 2. P. 2017.
  11. 11. Mol S.E., Bus A.G. To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood // Psychol. Bull. 2011. V. 137. № 2. P. 267.
  12. 12. Locher F., Pfost M. The relation between time spent reading and reading comprehension throughout the life course // J. Res. Read. 2020. V. 43. № 1. P. 57.
  13. 13. Duncan L.G., McGeown S.P., Griffiths Y.M. et al. Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension // Br. J. Psychol. 2015. V. 107. № 2. P. 209.
  14. 14. Cromley J.G., Azevedo R. Testing and refining the Direct and Inferential Mediation model of reading comprehension // J. Educ. Psychol. 2007. V. 99. № 2. P. 311.
  15. 15. Van den Broek P. Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation // Science. 2010. V. 328. № 5977. P. 453.
  16. 16. Rayner K., Chace K.H., Slattery T.J., Ashby J. Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading // Sci. Stud. Read. 2006. V. 10. № 3. P. 241.
  17. 17. Регуляция поведения и когнитивной деятельности в подростковом возрасте. Мозговые механизмы / Под ред. Мачинской Р.И., Фарбер Д.А. М.: Изд-во Московского психолого-социального университета, 2023. 615 с.
  18. 18. Комкова Ю.Н., Безруких М.М., Бабанова К.Ю. и др. Глазодвигательная активность и вегетативное обеспечение когнитивной деятельности при чтении у подростков. Часть I. Функциональная “цена” когнитивной деятельности при чтении текста с экрана электронного устройства у подростков // Физиология человека. 2024. T. 50. № 2. C. 57.
  19. 19. Безруких М.М., Иванов В.В. Окуломоторная активность при чтении у детей с разной степенью сформированности навыка. Сообщение 1. Особенности окуломоторной активности у хорошо и плохо читающих детей - 7 лет // Новые исследования. 2014. Т. 41. № 4. С. 67.
  20. 20. Slattery T.J., Parker A.J. Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations // Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2019. V. 26. № 6. P. 1948.
  21. 21. Боголюбов Л.Н., Лазебникова А.Ю., Лобанов И.А. и др. Обществознание. 9 класс: учеб. для общеобразоват. организаций. М.: Просвещение, 2021. 224 с.
  22. 22. Иванов В.В. К вопросу о возможности использования лингвистических характеристик сложности текста при исследовании окуломоторной активности при чтении у подростков // Новые исследования. 2013. Т. 34. № 1. С. 42.
  23. 23. Оборнева И.В. Автоматизация оценки качества восприятия текста // Вестник МГПУ. Серия: Информатика и информатизация образования. 2005. № 5. С. 86.
  24. 24. Reichle E.D., Liversedge S.P., Drieghe D. et al. Using E-Z reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill // Dev. Rev. 2013. V. 33. № 2. P. 110.
  25. 25. Parker A.J., Slattery T.J. Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2021. V. 74. № 1. P. 135.
  26. 26. Parker A.J., Slattery T.J., Kirkby J.A. Return-sweep saccades during reading in adults and children // Vision Res. 2019. V. 155. P. 35.
  27. 27. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J. Task effects on eye movements during reading // J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2010. V. 36. № 6. P. 1561.
  28. 28. Rayner K. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers // J. Exp. Child Psychol. 1986. V. 41. № 2. P. 211.
  29. 29. Безруких М.М., Иванов В.В. Глазодвигательная активность при чтении у детей младших классов с разной степенью сформированности навыка чтения // Chuzhdoezikovo Obuchenie. 2019. V. 46. № 1. P. 9.
  30. 30. Babanova K., Revazov A., Chernozatonskiy K. et al. An application of eye movement parameters collected from mass market devices for the estimation of a text comprehension // J. Eye Mov. Res. 2023. V. 16. № 2. doi: 10.16910/jemr.16.2.1.
  31. 31. Kim Y.-S.G., Petscher Y., Vorstius C. Unpacking eye movements during oral and silent reading and their relations to reading proficiency in beginning readers // Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2019. V. 58. P. 102.
  32. 32. Parshina O., Sekerina I., Lopukhina A., von der Malsburg T. Monolingual and bilingual reading strategies in Russian: An exploratory scanpath analysis // Read. Res. Q. 2022. V. 57. № 2. P. 469.
  33. 33. Schotter E.R., Tran R., Rayner K. Don’t believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading // Psychol. Sci. 2014. V. 25. № 6. P. 1218.
  34. 34. Wonnacott E., Joseph H.S., Adelman J.S., Nation K. Is children’s reading “good enough”? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2016. V. 69. № 5. P. 855.
  35. 35. Christianson K., Luke S.G., Hussey E.K., Wochna K.L. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2017. V. 70. № 7. P. 1380.
  36. 36. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research // Psychol. Bull. 1998. V. 124. № 3. P. 372.
  37. 37. Mézière D., Yu L., Reichle E. et al. Using eye-tracking measures to predict reading comprehension // Read. Res. Q. 2023. V. 58. № 3. P. 425.
  38. 38. Helo A., Pannasch S., Sirri L., Rämä P. The maturation of eye movement behavior: Scene-viewing characteristics in children and adults // Vision Res. 2014. V. 103. P. 83.
  39. 39. Justino J., Kolinsky R. Eye movements during reading in beginning and skilled readers: Impact of reading level or physiological maturation? // Acta Psychol. 2023. V. 236. P. 103927.
  40. 40. Slattery T.J., Yates M. Word skipping: Effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2018. V. 71. № 1. P. 250.
  41. 41. Yeari M., Oudega M., van den Broek P. The effect of highlighting on processing and memory of central and peripheral text information: Evidence from eye movements // J. Res. Read. 2017. V. 40. № 4. P. 365.
  42. 42. McConkie G.W., Zola D., Grimes J. et al. Children’s eye movements during reading / Vision and visual dyslexia // Ed. Stein J.F. Boston: CRC Press, 1991. P. 251.
  43. 43. Kim Y.-S.G., Little C., Petscher Y., Vorstius C. Developmental trajectories of eye movements in oral and silent reading for beginning readers: a longitudinal investigation // Sci. Rep. 2022. V. 12. № 1. P. 18708.
  44. 44. Verhoeven L., van Leeuwe J., Vermeer A. Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years // Sci. Stud. Read. 2011. V. 15. № 1. P. 8.
  45. 45. Coltheart M. Dual route and connectionist models of reading: An overview // Lond. Rev. Educ. 2006. V. 4. № 1. P. 5.
  46. 46. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2009. V. 62. № 8. P. 1457.
  47. 47. Schotter E.R., Tran R., Rayner K. Don’t believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading // Psychol. Sci. 2016. V. 25. № 6. P. 1218.
  48. 48. Radach R., Kennedy A., Rayner K. Eye movements and information processing during reading: Preface // Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2004. V. 16. № 1-2. P. 1.
  49. 49. Lefton L., Nagle R., Johnson G., Fisher D. Eye movement dynamics of good and poor readers: Then and now // J. Read Behav. 1979. V. 11. P. 319.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library