RAS PhysiologyФизиология человека Human Physiology

  • ISSN (Print) 0131-1646
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6150

Electroencephalographic features of alcohol use disorders with different decision-making efficiency in risk conditions

PII
10.31857/S0131164624030056-1
DOI
10.31857/S0131164624030056
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 50 / Issue number 3
Pages
56-62
Abstract
In order to identify the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the violation of decision-making in risk conditions, we conducted a comparative analysis of spectral EEG indicators of patients with alcohol use disorders with different effectiveness of their decision-making in a number of cognitive tasks. As a result of the cluster analysis, two subgroups of patients were identified: with “moderate” and with “pronounced” decision-making deficit, which did not differ in socio–demographic and clinical indicators (p > 0.05). The subgroup of patients with a “pronounced” decision-making deficit differed statistically significantly lower values of the spectral power of θ- and α-rhythm in the central (p = 0.018 for θ-rhythm and p = 0.017 for α-rhythm), parietal (p = 0.031 for θ-rhythm and p = 0.014 for α-rhythm), occipital (p = 0.029 for θ-rhythm and p = 0.016 for α-rhythm) and temporal (p = 0.022 on the left and p = 0.043 on the right for α-rhythm) leads compared with patients with “moderate” decision-making deficit. Thus, in a subgroup of patients with a “pronounced” deficit of decision-making, a certain deficit of the brain’s inhibitory systems was noted.
Keywords
алкоголизм принятие решений риск спектральная мощность количественная ЭЭГ
Date of publication
01.03.2024
Year of publication
2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
25

References

  1. 1. Glantz M.D., Bharat C., Degenhardt L. et al. The epidemiology of alcohol use disorders cross-nationally: Findings from the World Mental Health Surveys // Addict. Behav. 2020. V. 102. P. 106128.
  2. 2. Yen F.S., Wang S.I., Lin S.Y. et al. The impact of heavy alcohol consumption on cognitive impairment in young old and middle old persons // J. Transl. Med. 2022. V. 20. № 1. P. 155.
  3. 3. Галкин С.А., Бохан Н.А. Особенности когнитивного процесса принятия решений, основанных на вознаграждении, у больных алкогольной зависимостью // Ж. неврол. и психиатр. им. C.C. Корсакова. 2023. Т. 123. № 2. С. 37.
  4. 4. Пешковская А.Г., Галкин С.А., Бохан Н.А. Когнитивные функции и их нарушения при алкогольной зависимости: обзор актуальных концепций, гипотез и методов исследования // Сибирский психол. журнал. 2023. № 87. С. 138.
  5. 5. Максимова И.В. Когнитивные и электроэнцефалографические изменения у пациентов с алкогольной зависимостью, перенесших судорожный припадок // Сибирский вестник психиатрии и наркологии. 2018. № 2. С. 89.
  6. 6. Arts N.J., Walvoort S.J., Kessels R.P. Korsakoff’s syndrome: A critical review // Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2017. V. 13. P. 2875.
  7. 7. Brevers D., Bechara A., Cleeremans A. et al. Impaired decision-making under risk in individuals with alcohol dependence // Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2014. V. 38. № 7. P. 1924.
  8. 8. Галкин С.А., Бохан Н.А. Нарушения когнитивных механизмов принятия решений, связанных с вознаграждением, при алкогольной зависимости // Ж. неврол. и психиатр. им. C.C. Корсакова. 2023. Т. 123. № 4. С. 98.
  9. 9. Brevers D., Cleeremans A., Goudriaan A.E. et al. Decision making under ambiguity but not under risk is related to problem gambling severity // Psychiatry Res. 2012. V. 200. № 2-3. P. 568.
  10. 10. Levin I., Weller J., Pederson A., Harshman L. Age-related differences in adaptive decision-making: sensitivity to expected value in risky choice // Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2007. V. 2. № 4. P. 225.
  11. 11. Bowden-Jones H., McPhillips M., Rogers R. et al. Risk-taking on tests sensitive to ventromedial prefrontal cortex dysfunction predicts early relapse in alcohol dependency: a pilot study // J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2005. V. 17. № 3. P. 417.
  12. 12. Изнак А.Ф., Медведева Т.И., Изнак Е.В. и др. Нарушения нейрокогнитивных механизмов принятия решений при депрессии // Физиология человека. 2016. Т. 42. № 6. С. 18.
  13. 13. Gomez P., Ratcliff R., Perea M. A model of the go/no–go task // J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2007. V. 3. № 3. P. 389.
  14. 14. Lejuez C.W., Read J.P., Kahler C.W. et al. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) // J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2002. V. 8. № 2. P. 75.
  15. 15. Romeu R.J., Haines N., Ahn W.Y. et al. A computational model of the Cambridge gambling task with applications to substance use disorders // Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020. V. 206. P. 107711.
  16. 16. Bull P.N., Tippett L.J., Addis D.R. Decision making in healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task: New insights from an operant approach // Front. Psychol. 2015. V. 6. P. 391.
  17. 17. Изнак А.Ф., Изнак Е.В., Медведева Т.И. и др. Особенности спектральных параметров ЭЭГ у больных депрессией с разной эффективностью принятия решений // Физиология человека. 2018. Т. 44. № 6. С. 27.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library